Google Pixel XL Review

Google Pixel XL Review

Google Pixel XL




What Is It?

The Pixel XL is the first smartphone "made by Google".
Google has been making software for smartphones for almost a decade now. It's also worked with partners including Samsung, LG, and Huawei on the Nexus product line, a series of reference smartphones designed to showcase the latest version of Android. But the Pixel XL is one of the first two smartphones that Google can call its own, where there's no other name on the box.
Both are technically built by Taiwanese smartphone manufacturer HTC, and while those familiar with HTC's devices will recognise the look and feel, its name is absent from both the phones and the packaging. This marks a key shift from how Google has operated in the past, and effectively means it's competing with the likes of Samsung and LG; manufacturers building phones using Google software. 
As with most big smartphone launches, Google is making two devices available: Pixel, and Pixel XL. Pixel is the smaller of the two, with a 5-inch display Pixel XL, as the name suggests, is a bit larger, boasting a 5.5-inch screen.
While the Pixel and Pixel XL are pretty similar in terms of design and hardware, this review focuses solely on the Pixel XL. We're hoping to have a separate review of the smaller Pixel in the near future.
The design of the Pixel XL might not stand out in the way it does on Samsung's latest phones, but hardware is only half the story.
The Pixel XL represents Google taking a big step forward in developing hardware and software side by side. At the moment, this vertically integrated approach to smartphones is almost exclusively Apple's domain. So what does it mean now that Google is giving it a shot with Android?
Well for starters, you'll get software updates straight from Google, so you'll actually be able to update to new versions of Android. While getting new features is obviously fun, the more important side to this is you'll also get security updates.
Google's take on an iPhone has also resulted in a clever camera backed up by smart software tricks, integrated tech support, an unfettered operating system, and a couple of (temporarily) exclusive features.


Notable Features

The Pixel and Pixel XL are the first phones to feature Google's latest take on artificial intelligence - Google Assistant - which is ostensibly a souped up version of the Google Now feature found on other Android phones. While Google Assistant promises to be a friendlier, more conservational digital companion, it still feels like a work in a progress.
The biggest impediment to Google Assistant being genuinely useful is that it still struggles with context. For example, I asked it to show me what movies were playing nearby, and it dutifully brought up session times. I followed up this up with "which ones are good?", which instead returned an irrelevant list of different movies that people are currently talking about online.
The most embarrassing example of Google Assistant's lack of awareness was when I asked it about my favourite colour. It said that it didn't know, and then asked me to tell it. I responded with "blue". It shot back, "Sorry, I don't understand." 
I just don't even.
Replying with "blue is my favourite colour" helped Google Assistant "understand" what I was on about, but it almost entirely undermines the point of a conversational AI.
While Assistant is far from a revolutionary experience, it does have some clever features. It genuinely can learn about you. For example, if you ask it to play a song, it will ask you what app you'd like it to do so in. The next time you ask it to play a song, it will remember your preference from last time. 
Google says that Assistant's ability to learn about you is one of its key differentiators, and that It will eventually be able to use all of this information for background information when dealing with your other requests.
One small feature I liked was that Google Assistant will send you weather notifications for the day ahead. Around 8pm each night, you'll get an alert with tomorrow's forecast, detailing how the temperature will vary to the current day. It's not exactly a feature that showcases what Google's AI can do, but it’s a small slice of useful information.
As "first generation" as Assistant feels, you can see the potential that's there. It makes a genuine case for talking to the Pixel when you're dealing with simple tasks; I've gotten into the habit of saying "wake me up at 7" rather than setting an alarm. Sure, you could do this with Google Now too, but Google Now also made you open the Clock app to finalise the command, Google Assistant just does it. But when it comes to more complex tasks, you're currently better off doing them yourself; it will save yourself the hassle of arguing with a robot.
While I can't vouch for Assistant's future, Google says it's always learning, so hopefully it will get better at dealing with context and complex situations sooner rather than later.
Google Assistant is built into Pixel Launcher, a new look home screen that offers a small deviation from what you'd get in a vanilla Android phone. Other than having Google Assistant built into the home button (hold it down for a second to bring up assistant), the big difference is the "app drawer" button is gone. Rather than pressing a button to see all the apps you've got installed on the Pixel XL, you swiping up from the app dock. While Android veterans will almost certainly face a bit of a learning curve, swiping up to see your apps feels like a faster, more intuitive gesture.
The Pixel and Pixel XL are also the first two smartphones to support Google's new virtual reality setup, Daydream. The first Daydream headset won't be out until November, but based on an early hands on, it's a nice step-up from Samsung's Gear VR. The headset is made from a lightweight sport shoe-like fabric, which makes it a lot more comfortable than the Gear VR, and there's enough room to actually still wear glasses underneath. Other nifty features include NFC pairing (there's no need to plug anything in) and a Wiimote-like motion controller, which is a much better experience than tapping the side of a headset.
Google is also giving all Pixel owners unlimited cloud storage for photos and videos, in full resolution - even if you're shooting 4K video. Rather than expecting you to manually move these over to the cloud to free up space on your device, the Pixel XL has a feature called smart storage.
If the phone gets close to full, it will automatically delete any photos or videos you've got backed up but haven't viewed for over 90 days. These will then live in the cloud, but they'll still appear in your Photos app alongside everything still stored on your device. If you want to be a bit more ruthless with your automatic culling, you can decrease the threshold to 60 days or 30 days. Alternatively, you can disable the feature entirely.
While Google doesn't have a retail presence for support in the same way that Samsung and Apple do, it's built 24/7 support into the Settings app. A separate pane lets you chat to a technician, share your screen, or make a phone call.


What's Good?

The Pixel XL is the most polished Android experience money can buy, as you might expect given Google designed both the hardware and software. Not only does this result in zippy performance free from any third party bloatware, it also means you'll actually get software and security updates. In fact, Telstra is even promising that it will deliver updates to customers who get it on contract the same day Google sends them out to customers who nab the Pixel XL outright.
While this might not sound like a big deal, it's a big improvement over the current situation where telcos often delay updates due to internal testing.
Software is important, because hardware is becoming less and less of a differentiator when it comes to smartphones. There's still a difference between a $300 Android phone and a $1,000 Android phone in terms of performance, display quality, and camera, but that gap is rapidly shrinking. Especially when it comes to "day to day" usage.
Think about how laptops have become homogenous - some are thicker, some are thinner, some have a touchscreen, some don't - but they all look very similar, and do a very similar job, regardless of how much they cost. Laptops were once a luxury, but they're now a commodity. The same is happening to the world of smartphones. Smartphones are going to get boring.
But I'm of the opinion that software features are where the potential for greater innovation lies, and will be what keeps pushing smartphones forward - even if hardware stays mostly the same. As such, it's great to see that Android now has a player simultaneously working on hardware and software. Since Google oversees both in this case, the Pixel XL will get new features ahead of other phones, and potentially a couple of exclusives. 
One of these exclusives is a new camera feature called Smartburst. If you hold down the shutter button to take a series of photos, the Pixel XL is able to automatically pick out the sharpest photo (and do so accurately). If you're dealing with motion, it makes it easy to just point and shoot without thinking.
The Pixel phones could also serve as a cornerstone for a stronger Google ecosystem. We're already seeing the start of this; Google wants the "same" Google Assistant to live in your phone, and in your house via the Google Home speaker. Whether you're interacting with Google Assistant through your phone or through the speaker, it will have access to the same learnings, creating the illusion of omnipresence.
While software is all well and good, hardware is still an important part of the smartphone equation. Fortunately, the Pixel XL delivers high-end internals in spades.


For one, Google claims the Pixel XL has the world's best smartphone camera, based on tests done by camera benchmarker DxOMark. It's worth noting that DxOMark judges sensor quality, as opposed to real world performance, so it's easy to take this bravado with a grain of salt. 
That being said, the Pixel XL has a great camera. I'm not sure if I'd necessarily call it the best smartphone camera, but it comfortably sits alongside the iPhone 7 and Galaxy S7 in terms of quality.
Firstly, the Pixel XL camera is fast to launch and fast to shoot. Notably, you can double tap the phone's power button to start the camera from anywhere, regardless of whether you've got the device locked or not.
I was actually a little shocked by how detailed the photos taken by the Pixel XL are; even when you're looking at 100% crop, you get a remarkably clear and crisp image (at least when shooting during the day). I showed a couple of friends photos I took using the Pixel XL's camera, and they assumed they were shot on a DSLR.
The Pixel XL also does a fantastic job of handling tricky lighting situations. If you're shooting directly at the sun, you'll see the sky and the sun as separate elements. On the other hand, many other smartphone cameras will simply blow out the entire sky.
However, the Pixel XL doesn't have any optical image stabilisation. As such, I found lowlight photos weren't quite as sharp as the comparison shots I took on an iPhone 7 (but they came close). The Pixel XL also seems to lower shutter-speed and crank ISO to compensate for the lack of optical image stabilisation, so dark images can end up being a little noisy and exhibit artifacts.
Out of the box, you'll find photos taken by the Pixel XL make use of a vivid, saturated colour palate. This is similar to what you'd get when shooting on a Galaxy S7. For comparison, iPhone cameras tend to do a better job of preserving a scene's natural colours.
All in all, Google's made a reliable shooter that takes high quality images.
On a related note, the Pixel XL is one of the few flagships without a camera bump on the rear.
While the Pixel XL isn't the most visually interesting smartphone, it feels great from an ergonomic perspective. Despite the 5.5-inch display and phone's sizeable stature, the Pixel XL is easy enough to use one-handed. It's not too heavy, and the curved body makes it simple enough to bang out a message with one hand. That being said, two is still much faster, and saves an awkward stretch over to "Q".
The Pixel XL's rear-facing fingerprint reader isn't quite as convenient as the front-facing option typically found on its competitors, but it's lightning fast nonetheless. It does however mean you have to pick up the phone to unlock it.
Last but not least, Pixel XL nails the smartphone cornerstones of screen quality and battery life. Google's kitted out the Pixel XL with a Quad HD 5.5-inch that's bright, vibrant, and still easy enough to use in direct sunlight.
In terms of battery life, you can expect about a full day of usage with a comfortable buffer. A heavy day of usage - including a bit of gaming - leaves me with around 15% around midnight, whereas if I take it bit easier, I'll have as much as 30% left. While it's nice to dream of a two-day battery life, the Pixel XL is roughly on par with the S7 Edge, balancing power, screen quality, and longevity reasonably well.


What's Not So Good?

2016 is the year water-resistant smartphones went mainstream. Samsung brought the feature back with the S7 and S7 Edge, and Apple finally introduced it to the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. Given the Pixel XL is priced in line with and pitched squarely against these phones, it's a shame water-resistance didn't make it onto the feature list.
I wouldn't call water-resistance a must, but it's certainly at the top of the "nice to have" list. It's great to have that little bit of extra assurance that a brief aquatic encounter won't render your phone useless. Especially when it costs over $1,000.
The Pixel XL's lack of water-resistance isn't a deal breaker, it's just an odd omission when the phone's two biggest competitors both offer it.
While the Pixel XL isn't a Nexus phone, it's undeniably the successor to the Nexus program. While Google is still maintaining the core philosophy of an unfettered version of Android with expedient software updates, the bang-for-buck pricing is gone along with the Nexus moniker. If you want a Pixel smartphone, you're looking at a minimum of $1,079, which incidentally, is what the cheapest iPhone 7 will cost you. If you're after the Pixel XL, it starts at $1,269. 
For comparison, the Nexus 5X started at $659 when it launched last year, and the Nexus 6P at $899. These weren't exactly what I'd call cheap either, but they were definitely more affordable than the other flagships on the market at the time.
While the Pixel XL doesn't share a price-tag with its Nexus predecessors, Google has held firm on one key feature: the lack of expandable storage. You can't just pop in a microSD to give your Pixel a bigger brain. All Pixel devices start at 32GB, which makes the omission of a microSD slot a little more palatable, but the option to boost your phone's internal memory has long been one of Android's defining features. 
Instead, Google is hoping you'll be happy to live a cloud-first lifestyle. As aforementioned, all Pixel owners get unlimited full resolution photo and video storage through Google Drive. This is all well and good if you've got constant connectivity and a hefty data plan, but otherwise, you might need to fork out for the even pricier 128GB configuration.


The Pixel XL might be an ergonomic device, but it's hard to get past the fact the design is a little too familiar and a little too conservative. That's not to say the Pixel XL is an unattractive design, it just almost has a "stock photo smartphone" feel to it.
I can understand Google playing it safe to avoid alienating potential customers, but the Pixel XL almost feels a little too safe, especially when Samsung has been anything but conservative this year. It's a shame that neither the Pixel or Pixel XL are available in "Really Blue" in Australia, as even just the use of an unconventional colour would have helped make the phones feel a little fresher. And while Google is at it, it could have used the three other colours from its logo - red, green, and yellow - as alternate Pixel colour schemes. At the very least, the use of non-mainstream smartphone colours would have given the Pixel XL a bit of personality.

Camera Samples



100% crop


100% crop


Who Is It For?

As promising as Google Assistant is, don't buy the Pixel XL if you're expecting a phone you can have a conversation with. Google Assistant is a start, but it's not quite there yet.
Buy the Pixel XL if you’re looking for a premium Android smartphone that isn't made by Samsung.
The screen is lovely, the camera is fantastic, battery life is what you'd expect from an Android flagship, and I've got no complaints about performance. The only thing that's missing is water-resistance. The lack of optical image stabilisation is a shame but it doesn't stop the Pixel XL's camera from being held up with the best, and while a rear-facing fingerprint reader might bug some that's more of a matter of personal preference.
If you're after a cutting-edge device in terms of design, you might still be better off going a phone like the S7 Edge, but if you're looking at dropping over $1,000 on an Android phone, I'd personally recommend the Pixel. 


As someone who has spent far too much of his life working in desktop support, I'd say that guaranteed security and software updates are a genuine reason to consider buying the Pixel or Pixel XL over other premium Android smartphones. While this kind of post-purchase support should be a given, this unfortunately isn't the case when it comes to the fragmented nightmare that Android has become.
I might sound like a cranky old man rambling about security, but given how much personal information we store on our phones (banking, contacts, text messages, work emails, sneaky sexts), it's vital. Security is something I care about, it's something you should care about, and it's something hardware manufacturers should care about.
Google had a good track record when it came to updating Nexus devices, so there's no reason to assume otherwise with the Pixel XL.
The Pixel XL is a great phone, but it almost wins by default. Guaranteed security patches and software updates make the Pixel XL better than the sum of its parts, and that's kind of sad. These shouldn't be a feature or a selling point, these should be a given.
At the very least, maybe the Pixel and Pixel XL will force other Android manufacturers to care about security. Whether you're buying a $300 phone or a $1,000 phone, post purchase patching and support shouldn't be something you need to ask about.

What Else Can I Buy?



If a 5.5-inch screen is too big, the 5-inch Pixel might be more up your alley. Other than screen size - and battery as a result - it's identical to the Pixel XL. Inside, you'll find the same processor, the same storage options, and the same great camera. You'll also save yourself a bit of money if you opt for the smaller Pixel, which makes it easier to splurge on the 128GB option!


If you want hardware and software built in tandem, but don't want Android, the iPhone is kinda your only other option. If you're happy with spending the same amount of money as you would on Google's latest, the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus are both priced in line with the Pixel and Pixel XL. You still don't get expandable storage, but both new iPhones are water-resistant. 


If you're okay with trading software quality for design, it's worth considering the S7 Edge. Samsung's 5.5-inch flagship is undeniably the most striking phone on the market, even if it is a bit of a fingerprint magnet. While you'll benefit from expandable storage and water-resistance, you'll be relying on Samsung for software updates. As such, you might be waiting for quite some time before you get bumped up to Android Nougat.


The Moto Z is another 5.5-inch Android smartphone, although with a bit more of an interesting design. The Moto Z has two claims to fame: it's just 5.2mm thin at its slimmest point, and you can attach a whole plethora of magnetic "Moto Mods" to the back of the phone, including a battery pack, portable projector, and better camera. While the Moto Z runs a mostly stock version of Android, Motorola is much slower at distributing software and security updates than Google.



I hope that the review may be liked

Thank you

Moto X Force Review

Moto X Force Review

Moto X Force




What Is it?

The Moto X Force is a smartphone that's defined by its durability. Motorola says the device's "ShatteShield" display is the first smartphone screen that's guaranteed not to crack or shatter. And if you somehow do manage to damage it, there's a four-year warranty covering the screen.
The Moto X Force was originally released at the tail-end of 2015 as a more durable companion to the Moto X Play and the Moto X Style.
Motorola doesn't have the best track record with getting smartphones to Australia in a timely manner, and the Moto X Force is no exception; the phone was launched internationally almost a year ago. While it's frustrating that it took Motorola so long to bring the Moto X Force to Australia shores, the belated arrival has its own benefits. The phone has flagship grade internals (at least, it did when it was announced), but the late local release has seen it repositioned at more of a midrange price point: $599.
The Moto X Force isn't what I'd describe as a slimline or overly stylish smartphone, but the phone isn't as rugged as you'd expect. It's a touch bulkier than the average handset, but you wouldn't necessarily assume it was drop-proof; it just looks like a smartphone.
Drop-proof smartphones also typically offer some form of water-resistance, and the Moto X Force does. Well, it's water repellent, rather than water-resistant. In Motorola's words, the Moto X Force will survive "moderate exposure" to spills, splashes or light rain, but the phone isn't designed to be submerged, exposed to pressurised water, or other liquids. In other words, if you spill water on the Moto X Force, you won't have to go out and buy a new phone. If you drop it in the pool, you might not be so lucky.
In Australia, the Moto X Force is being sold with a ballistic nylon back (other markets had different options available to them, but we only get one). While it's an unusual choice for a phone, it's got a nice grip to it, making the Moto X Force comfortable to hold. Notably, the back isn't just textured plastic. If you look closely, you'll see the individual threads.

What's Good?

It's hard to break the Moto X Force. Really hard. The WhistleOut team was pretty intent on making the shatterproof display shatter, but the Moto X Force managed to survive our over-the-top torture test.
Our first punishment was a 6 metre drop onto carpeted floor. It survived. This was followed by a 4 metre drop onto bitumen. The body got scuffed, but the phone survived. I threw it over my shoulder. A bit more wear and tear, but the screen remained intact.
Finally, I threw it at a brick wall. A corner took a bit of a beating, and a small part of the screen's top layer warped, but the Moto X Force is still chugging along.
While the Moto X Force is definitely worse for wear, it runs like nothing happened. The screen is still responsive, the camera survived unscathed, all speakers still work, and the phone still charges. As much as we wanted to break the Moto X Force, we weren't able to.
It doesn't look pretty, but the Moto X Force is still working after 15 or so significant drops. That's kind of nuts. There's not even a single scratch on the display.
Even if you somehow managed to crack the screen, the Moto X Force has a four-year warranty for display. While this won't cover scratches or cosmetic damage, it's still nice to have.
The Moto X Force might be a year old and only cost $599, but for all intents and purposes, it's still a flagship smartphone. The internals might not be quite as new and shiny as you'll find in devices from this year, but in most cases, the speed difference between a top-tier 2015 device and top-tier 2016 device is negligible. That's not to say a newer phone isn't more powerful, you just won't necessarily notice when it comes to day-to-day tasks.
Motorola's clean take on Android certainly helps with performance; the phone is free from user interface modifications and superfluous apps. One of the few non-stock features available in the Moto X Force is a not-quite-always-on display that shows you new notifications and time on a black and white screen. This springs to life when you touch the screen or pick the phone up.
Battery life is another plus; if you're not pushing the Moto X Force to its limits, you should comfortably get two days in between chargers. If you're a heavier user (or spend all of your free time playing games on your phone), you'll find you're recharging on a daily basis. That being said, I still found myself with a comfortable buffer of around 30 or so percent on "big usage" days.

What's Not So Good?

There's no way around it; if you're buying the Moto X Force, you're buying last year's phone. This isn't necessarily a huge deal, but it's still worth keeping in mind. Motorola is planning to still give the phone an upgrade to Android Nougat later this year (it's currently running Marshmallow), but you might not see too many software updates after that point.
While you might be okay without getting anymore new features, a lack of security updates is a concern. Android devices are a popular target for hackers, in part due to how lax manufacturers are when it comes to providing updates to their smartphones. A University of Cambridge study published in April last year found that 87% of active Android devices are exposed to at least one critical vulnerability that could be exploited by a malicious app. 
Unfortunately, the Moto X Force doesn't have a fingerprint reader. This might not bother everyone, but we're starting to see biometric authentication even available in phones priced under $300. While banging in a PIN to unlock your phone isn't terrible, it's a far cry from the convenience a fingerprint reader offers. First world problems, right?
The Moto X Force's shatterproof display will stop you from breaking your phone, but it does come with a few trade-offs. The most significant of these is that it hampers outdoor usability. If you're standing in sunlight, the Moto X Force is almost unusable. A smaller issue is colour balance; while the Moto X Force's display is vibrant, it's not very bright. This results in whites that look more like greys.
The Moto X Force's camera is good but not great. It doesn't quite compare to this year's top shooters - Samsung Galaxy S7, Apple iPhone 7, LG G5 - let alone the best of last year. While the camera is better than you'd expect for a $600 phone, it isn't always reliable. You'll get a solid photo most of the time, but the Moto X Force is also prone to motion blur. This is even more noticeable when shooting lowlight environments.
Notably, the Moto X Force is one of the few phones that includes a front-facing flash, for when you want a brighter selfie.

Camera Samples

100% crop
100% crop

Who's It For?

The Moto X Force is a great buy for value-conscience shoppers after a hard-to-break smartphone. While the drop-proof device is a solid value - excuse the pun - there are a few caveats to consider. The display isn't great outdoors, especially in the Australia sun. There's no fingerprint reader, which is a minor inconvenience. And the Moto X Force is last year's phone, so it's nearing the end of its like from a software support perspective, which isn't great if you want the latest and greatest in terms of Android updates.
However, if you've got a habit of breaking smartphones, the Moto X Force is easy to recommend. It's looks good for a ruggedised smartphone, and its hard-to-shatter nature could easily save you far more than the phone's $599 asking price.

What Else Can I Buy?

If you're looking for a hard-to-break phone on a budget, take a look at the Alcatel Go Play. It boasts drop-proofing, IP67 water-resistance (although you need to ensure all the ports are covered before it gets dunked), and a surprisingly affordable asking price of $299. Performance isn't amazing due to very low-end hardware, but if you want to give the kids a phone they'll struggle to break, the Alcatel Go Play fits the bill.
The high-vis Telstra Tough Max is almost the stereotypical rugged smartphone; it looks and feels like it would take a beating. It's not what you'd call a good looking device, but that's not why the Tough Max exists. As with the Alcatel Go Play, high-end hardware isn't on the agenda. That being said, the Tough Max is a bit faster than the Go Play, but a bit pricier too.
If you care less about durability and more about price, OPPO's R9 is worth a gander. Also priced at $599, the R9 is the very definition of bang-for-buck. While the R9's camera isn't quite as good as what you'd find in an iPhone 7 or Galaxy S7, you're getting a whole lot of phone for almost half of what you'd pay for a flagship device.


I hope that the review may be liked

Thank you

Oppo F1s review

Oppo F1s review

Oppo F1s


What's good
 As the old saying goes, if you can't beat them join them.
You'll feel like you've seen it before, because you have, sort of. The new Oppo F1s is a phone that inspires double-takes and closer scrutiny, thanks to a design that is so much like the iPhone 6 (and 6s and 7) that we can only wonder why the busy Apple legal team hasn't chased Oppo with a cease and desist.
In a lot of ways you can say that all smartphones look the same; big screen on the front, a camera on the back, buttons along the edges. But the Oppo F1s takes its inspiration even further. Our review unit has the same pearlescent white plastic on the front and gold-coloured brushed aluminium across the back that you'll find on newr iPhones. It has the same speaker grilles on the bottom of the handset, next to a headphone jack and charging port in the same positions as you find them on Apple's handsets.
And you know what? We like it. The design is sharp and has a premium feel, and it drives home the central message of this phone — that it is a lot like the market's favourite phones, only much, much cheaper. 
The similarities go further still, with the look and feel of the user experience borrowing heavily from Apple's iOS — despite running on Google's Android OS. Oppo calls this 'Color OS' and it removes many of the familiar elements common to Android phones and replaces the layout, and many of the icons, with tweaks cribbed straight from the iPhone.

Like the design, this may sound like a bad thing, but we'd beg to differ. We often hear that people are concerned about the learning curve when switching from an iPhone to an Android phone, and surely Color OS makes for an easy middle ground. The advanced settings are still more like Google's phones and will take a little getting use to, but iPhone fans should find the everyday experience with the Oppo F1s like speaking with an old friend.
There's a lot of phone here for the money you'll spend. For its pocket-pleasing $349 price tag, you get a phone with a sharp, colourful 5.5-inch screen, an Octo-core processor, a big 3GB RAM and a generous 3075mAh battery. There's 32GB onboard storage for apps and videos, plus a 16-megapixel camera on the back and a 13-megapixel camera on the front.
For as much as you judge a phone by how it works and not by the facts and figures on the specs sheet, this is an impressive array of hardware in a budget-priced model.
The 5.5-inch screen is particularly worthy of praise. Despite a lower resolution than many other more expensive models, the screen in the F1s holds its own. As phone reviewers we see screen with millions more pixels crammed into a similar sized space, and yet you'd be hard pressed to spot the difference with the Oppo. Text and images are sharp, colours are bright and the whites are pretty white. It has good off-angle viewing and looks great outdoors. It's a real winner.
Also great is the fingerprint scanner built over the Home Button on the front of the phone. There are, of course, several phones with this feature these days, but the Oppo F1s is one of the cheapest. Better still, the F1s is one of the fastest. When we turn on the phone using the power button, the phone unlocks in the same action, making the unlocking process practically invisible.

What's not so good

Criticising a phone at this price point is a difficult task, especially when it is a phone packed with as many great features as the Oppo F1s. As you can probably tell from the review so far, the F1s is a winner, but there are a couple of drawbacks here, many which are common to cheaper devices.
The cameras are both serviceable, but neither is great. The digital shutter and post-image processing are both noticeably slower than you see in better cameras, and the resulting images require a steady hand to stay in sharp focus. Colour reproduction is good, though, with nice, natural looking colours that are neither washed out or oversaturated.
The Mediatek processor in the F1s does a good job of handling the everyday tasks, but it's definitely not the fastest phone we've encountered. Some apps take a short time to open up and the web browser can feel a bit sticky at times. Not major problems in the scheme of things, and certainly not something that should deter you from taking a look at this great phone.

Who's it for?

At this price, the Oppo F1s is a generous combination of size and performance, and will appeal to anyone looking for a fully featured handset but on a budget. Outright phone purchases are becoming more and more popular, and this is exactly the sort of phone that will encourage this even more.
The F1s is also a great phone to lure iPhone fans to the Android platform. Oppo's Color OS is so much like iOS is style and layout that many will find it is an easier transition than it might be moving to a Samsung or HTC.

Camera Samples

What else can I buy?

Moto G4 Play
Another WhistleOut favourite in this price range, the latest Moto G4 is a great phone at a great price. You get a 5-inch screen, a big 2800mAh battery, 16GB storage and a microSD card slot for a memory card. Motorola also points out that the G4 Play has a water repellent coating, to save the phone from splashes, though this shouldn't be confused with real water resistance.

The new Sony Xperia XA is exactly what you want in a budget phone. In many ways, the XA is just a like a mini version of the bigger Xperia X. The internal components are different (and match the cheaper price) but you get some of the best parts of the Sony mobile experience, like a great camera and quick-charging battery tech.

If you have a few hundred extra to spend on a phone, you might consider the iPhone SE — Apple's most affordable smartphone. It offers basically the same performance you get from the bigger iPhone 6s models, but in a petite package with a 4-inch screen. Perfect for anyone who loves using their phone with one hand.


I hope that the review may be liked

Thank you

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium review

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium review

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium review

Reportedly one of Sony’s last chances to make it in the phone industry, late 2015 saw the iconic company release three smartphones alongside one another: the Xperia Z5 Compact, Xperia Z5, and the flagship Xperia Z5 Premium. All three phones are similar, or the same, in many aspects, and vary mostly in size and screen resolution.
The Premium is the first phone in the world to hit the market with a full 4K display. That’s the same resolution as that 4K UHD TV you’ve been eying off. It’s roughly 4X the number of pixels found on a 1080p screen, over 2X the pixels on something like a Galaxy S6 (1440x2560), and a whopping 8X an iPhone 6s Retina Display. It’s a great marketing angle, but it’s also tech you pay for.
Thanks to its 4K crown, the Z5 Premium is the most expensive flagship on the market by a long margin. Is it worth paying extra for the upgrade? Not really; unless you have the eyes of a hawk.

Display

So, what will 8.3 million pixels get you in a phone these days? Not too much more than half that will, it seems. Currently, most Android flagships run a 1440 x 2560 resolution, AKA ‘WQHD’, which offers about 3.6 million. That in itself is about double the 1080p HD resolution of most big-screen household TVs. 1080p is also the maximum resolution of Blu Ray discs and most video streaming services.
The problem is that, while some people can spot the difference between a 1080p and WQHD display on a smartphone, it takes near perfect vision to notice the jump from WQHD to 4K. Human eyes seemingly aren’t that good.
Pretty much the only way you’ll ever be able to tell that your phone is or isn’t packing that full 4K glory is by holding a WQHD phone like the Galaxy S6 or LG G4 next to the Xperia Z5 Premium and staring at the home screen icons on each. Yes, 4K is ‘better’, but these days higher pixel density is a game of decreasing-returns, and probably not one worth paying through the nose to play.
As for how the screen function as an actual screen, it’s pretty much OK. It’s fast, smooth and crisp. Colours come out well and contrast is deep. But maximum brightness is a little low and the screen cover is so reflective that viewing it outside on even a moderately glary day can be a chore.
Moreover, the screen panel itself ends up catching the light, meaning you see small, reflective lines appear from behind your screen image – not something you expect from any premium device, let alone one sold purely on its display quality.
All in all, the Z5 Premium’s display doesn’t offer enough to justify the jump in price, and is behind the competition in basic things like outdoor visibility. It’s fine, but for the price it needed to be outstanding.

User experience

The Z5 Premium is a powerful flagship Android. Unsurprisingly, this means it offers a great user experience. Love or hate Sony’s user interface (UI) design aesthetic, it works well and we never had any dramatic crashes, nor did we encounter bugs or lag.
For day to day stuff, or even the more hardcore end of the mobile gaming spectrum, it handles everything without any fuss.
The only problems we encountered were thanks to the physical design. Being made of glass front and back, the Z5 Premium is exceedingly slippery. Try sitting down for more than a few minutes and there’s a good chance it’ll slide right out of your pocket, at which point the glass construction comes back for a second punch as it’s more likely to shatter once it hits the floor.
This slipperiness is also a problem thanks to the phone’s large size. With a 5.5 inch display, it’s not the biggest smartphone on the market, but it’s above average. Normally it’s no problem, but when it’s tough to grip it becomes a problem pretty quickly. You could both this issue, and the pocket-slipping one by grabbing yourself a case, which is a good idea anyway, but keep in mind it’s a necessity here, rather than a wise decision.
Unlocking the Z5 Premium is pretty easy thanks to the lock button, which has a fingerprint scanner built right in. That is, it’s easy if you’re using your right hand. Lefties will have difficulty getting their stretched forefinger to register.
Moreover, if you pick the phone up and happen to be holding any part of your skin over the button, it will continue to vibrate and fail fingerprint scans until it locks the function out and asks for your pin. This happens a surprising amount.
What we originally thought would be a fantastically-placed feature turned out to be a hindrance just as often as it was a virtue. As it turns out the old front-located home screen button scanner on the iPhone and Galaxy S6, and the rear-mounted scanners of the 2015 Nexus and Huawei flagships turn out to be the better options.

Camera

Yet another area where the Z5 Premium would be good enough, if not for the killer price tag. The camera isn’t quite as good as the Galaxy S6 or LG G4, but it’s still pretty decent.
Day shots come out pretty well, but that’s to be expected with a modern flagship. However, be sure to spot that patch of glare in the top left of the photo above. The sun was behind the camera when that photo was taken, so the glare is from a regular patch of sky; not from a direct light source.
These days it’s all about low-light shots.
And night shots.
https://r3.whistleout.ca/public/images/articles/2016/01/DSC_0053.JPG
These the X5 Premium handles pretty well, but once you zoom in, or blow the pictures up to full-screen (just click any image), it's clear that the iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, Samsung Galaxy S6, Galaxy Note 5, and LG G4 are all far better once the sun goes down. Everyone of these phones is cheaper than the Z5 Premium.

Battery life

This phone has a huge battery; at 3550mAh (compared to the GS6’s 2550mAh), you’d think it’d just keep going. Well, it does, depending on how much you use that hungry 4K display.
Being such a battery hog, the screen makes the Z5 Premium somewhat unique in terms of how often you’ll need to charge it. On a day with even medium screen-on time, you’ll definitely be searching for an outlet before day’s end, if not earlier.
However, if you stick to thinks like listening to music, or have a couple of days of low usage, then you can make two days easily.

Verdict

The Z5 Premium was a bit of a let-down. It’s a good phone, sure, but it doesn’t justify its high cost. If you’re choosing between the Xperia Z5 and the Xperia Z5 Premium, then our advice is to save yourself the cash and go for the Z5. It may be “only” 1080p, but you’re not going to notice a massive difference in quality and it’s pretty much identical in every other way.
If a 5.5 inch Android is what you’re after, hit up the LG G4. It’s still one of our favourite phones on the market, and will probably continue to be until the G5 debuts later this year.
Alternatively, the larger 5.7 inch Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a great phone, and surprisingly not all that much larger in terms of physical dimensions.

I hope that the review may be liked

Thank you